How many kinds of Diphthongs are there?... Read more of How many kinds of Diphthongs are there? at Speaking Writing.comInformational Site Network Informational
   Home - Samurai - Code of Honor - Courage - Samuri Religion - History of Buddism


Introduction Of Zen Into China By Bodhidharma
An epoch-making event took place in the Buddhist history of C...

Life And Change
Transformation and change are the essential features of life;...

The Eternal Life As Taught By Professor Munsterberg
Some philosophical pessimists undervalue life simply because ...

Everything Is Living According To Zen
Everything alive has a strong innate tendency to preserve its...

Real Self
If there be no individual soul either in mind or body, where ...

Man Is Neither Good-natured Nor Bad-natured According To Su Shih
The difficulty may be avoided by a theory given by Su Shih ...

Zen And Supernatural Power
Yoga[FN#250] claims that various supernatural powers can be a...

Shakya Muni And The Prodigal Son
A great trouble with us is that we do not believe in half the...

Each Smile A Hymn Each Kindly Word A Prayer
The glorious sun of Buddha-nature shines in the zenith of Enl...

Change As Seen By Zen
Zen, like Hinayanism, does not deny the doctrine of Transienc...

The Theory Of Buddha-nature Adequately Explains The Ethical States Of Man
This theory of Buddha-nature enables us to get an insight int...

Zazen Or The Sitting In Meditation
Habit comes out of practice, and forms character by degrees, ...

Nature And Her Lesson
Nature offers us nectar and ambrosia every day, and everywher...

The Errors Of Philosophical Pessimists And Religious Optimists
Philosophical pessimists[FN#214] maintain that there are on e...

How To Worship Buddha
The author of Vimalakirtti-nirdeca-sutra well explains our at...

Hinayanism And Its Doctrine
The doctrine of Transience was the first entrance gate of Hin...

Idealistic Scepticism Concerning Objective Reality
But extreme Idealism identifies 'to be' with 'to be known,' a...

Thing-in-itself Means Thing-knowerless
How, then, did philosophers come to consider reality to be un...

The Progress And Hope Of Life
How many myriads of years have passed since the germs of life...

Nature Favours Nothing In Particular
There is another point of view of life, which gave the presen...

The Irrationality Of The Belief Of Immortality

Occidental minds believe in a mysterious entity under the name of
soul, just as Indian thinkers believe in the so-called subtle body
entirely distinct from the gross body of flesh and blood. Soul,
according to this belief, is an active principle that unites body and
mind so as to form an harmonious whole of mental as well as bodily
activities. And it acts through the instrumentality of the mind and
body in the present life, and enjoys an eternal life beyond the
grave. It is on this soul that individual immortality is based. It
is immortal Self.
Now, to say nothing of the origin of soul, this long-entertained
belief is hardly good for anything. In the first place, it throws no
light upon the relation of mind and body, because soul is an empty
name for the unity of mind and body, and serves to explain nothing.
On the contrary, it adds another mystery to the already mysterious
relationships between matter and spirit. Secondly, soul should be
conceived as a psychical individual, subject to spacial
determinations--but since it has to be deprived by death of its body
which individualizes it, it will cease to be individuality after
death, to the disappointment of the believer. How could you think
anything purely spiritual and formless existing without blending
together with other things? Thirdly, it fails to gratify the desire,
cherished by the believer, of enjoying eternal life, because soul has
to lose its body, the sole important medium through which it may
enjoy life. Fourthly, soul is taken as a subject matter to receive
in the future life the reward or the punishment from God for our
actions in this life; but the very idea of eternal punishment is
inconsistent with the boundless love of God. Fifthly, it is beyond
all doubt that soul is conceived as an entity, which unifies various
mental faculties and exists as the foundation of individual
personality. But the existence of such soul is quite incompatible
with the well-known pathological fact that it is possible for the
individual to have double or treble or multiple personalities. Thus
the belief in the existence of soul conceived by the common sense
turns out not only to be irrational, but a useless encumbrance on the
religious mind. Therefore Zen declares that there is no such thing
as soul, and that mind and body are one. Hwui Chung (Ye-chu), a
famous disciple of the Sixth Patriarch in China, to quote an example,
one day asked a monk: Where did you come from? I came, sir, from
the South, replied the man. What doctrine do the masters of the
South teach? asked Hwui Chung again. They teach, sir, that body is
mortal, but mind is immortal, was the answer. That, said the
master, is the heterodox doctrine of the Atman! How do you, sir,
questioned the monk, teach about that? I teach that the body and
mind are one, was the reply.[FN#183]

[FN#183] For further explanation, see Sho-bo-gen-zo and

Fiske, [FN#184] in his argument against materialism, blames the
denial of immortality, saying: The materialistic assumption that
there is no such state of things, and that the life of the soul ends
accordingly with the life of the body, is perhaps the most colossal
instance of baseless assumption that is known to the history of
philosophy. But we can say with equal force that the common-sense
assumption that the life of soul continues beyond the grave is,
perhaps, the most colossal instance of baseless assumption that is
known to the history of thought, because, there being no scientific
evidences that give countenance to the assumption, even the
spiritualists themselves hesitate to assert the existence of a ghost
or soul. Again he[FN#185] says: With this illegitimate hypothesis
of annihilation the materialist transgresses the bounds of experience
quite as widely as the poet who sings of the New Jerusalem with its
river of life and its street of gold. Scientifically speaking, there
is not a particle of evidence for either view. This is as much as
to say there is not a particle of evidence, scientifically speaking,
for the common-sense view of soul, because the poet's description of
the New Jerusalem is nothing but the result of the common-sense
belief of immortality.

[FN#184] 'The Destiny of Man,' p. 110.

[FN#185] 'The Destiny of Man,' pp. 110, 111.

Next: The Examination Of The Notion Of Self

Previous: Enlightenment Implies An Insight Into The Nature Of Self

Add to Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to Add to Google Add to Twitter Add to Stumble Upon
Add to Informational Site Network

Viewed 2580