VIEW THE MOBILE VERSION of Informational Site Network Informational
   Home - Samurai - Code of Honor - Courage - Samuri Religion - History of Buddism


Enlightened Consciousness Is Not An Intellectual Insight
Enlightened Consciousness is not a bare intellectual insight,...

Life And Change
Transformation and change are the essential features of life;...

The Bad Are The Good In The Egg
This is not only the case with a robber or a murderer, but al...

Where Then Does The Error Lie?
Where, then, does the error lie in the four possible proposit...

Our Conception Of Buddha Is Not Final
Has, then, the divine nature of Universal Spirit been complet...

Change As Seen By Zen
Zen, like Hinayanism, does not deny the doctrine of Transienc...

There Is No Mortal Who Is Purely Moral
By nature man should be either good or bad; or he should be g...

The Irrationality Of The Belief Of Immortality
Occidental minds believe in a mysterious entity under the nam...

The Ancient Buddhist Pantheon
The ancient Buddhist pantheon was full of deities or Buddhas,...

Thing-in-itself Means Thing-knowerless
How, then, did philosophers come to consider reality to be un...

Enlightened Consciousness
In addition to these considerations, which mainly depend on i...

The Breathing Exercise Of The Yogi
Breathing exercise is one of the practices of Yoga, and somew...

The Sermon Of The Inanimate
The Scripture of Zen is written with facts simple and familia...

Zen And Supernatural Power
Yoga claims that various supernatural powers can be acquired ...

The Application Of The Law Of Causation To Morals
Although it may be needless to state here the law of causatio...

Life In The Concrete
Life in the concrete, which we are living, greatly differs fr...

The Establishment Of The Rin Zai School Of Zen In Japan
The Lin Tsi school was started by Nan Yoh, a prominent d...

Zen Is Iconoclastic
For the followers of Bodhidharma, however, this conception of...

The Parable Of A Drunkard
Now the question arises, If all human beings are endowed with...

Do Thy Best And Leave The Rest To Providence
There is another point of view which enables us to enjoy life...

The Irrationality Of The Belief Of Immortality

Occidental minds believe in a mysterious entity under the name of
soul, just as Indian thinkers believe in the so-called subtle body
entirely distinct from the gross body of flesh and blood. Soul,
according to this belief, is an active principle that unites body and
mind so as to form an harmonious whole of mental as well as bodily
activities. And it acts through the instrumentality of the mind and
body in the present life, and enjoys an eternal life beyond the
grave. It is on this soul that individual immortality is based. It
is immortal Self.
Now, to say nothing of the origin of soul, this long-entertained
belief is hardly good for anything. In the first place, it throws no
light upon the relation of mind and body, because soul is an empty
name for the unity of mind and body, and serves to explain nothing.
On the contrary, it adds another mystery to the already mysterious
relationships between matter and spirit. Secondly, soul should be
conceived as a psychical individual, subject to spacial
determinations--but since it has to be deprived by death of its body
which individualizes it, it will cease to be individuality after
death, to the disappointment of the believer. How could you think
anything purely spiritual and formless existing without blending
together with other things? Thirdly, it fails to gratify the desire,
cherished by the believer, of enjoying eternal life, because soul has
to lose its body, the sole important medium through which it may
enjoy life. Fourthly, soul is taken as a subject matter to receive
in the future life the reward or the punishment from God for our
actions in this life; but the very idea of eternal punishment is
inconsistent with the boundless love of God. Fifthly, it is beyond
all doubt that soul is conceived as an entity, which unifies various
mental faculties and exists as the foundation of individual
personality. But the existence of such soul is quite incompatible
with the well-known pathological fact that it is possible for the
individual to have double or treble or multiple personalities. Thus
the belief in the existence of soul conceived by the common sense
turns out not only to be irrational, but a useless encumbrance on the
religious mind. Therefore Zen declares that there is no such thing
as soul, and that mind and body are one. Hwui Chung (Ye-chu), a
famous disciple of the Sixth Patriarch in China, to quote an example,
one day asked a monk: "Where did you come from?" "I came, sir, from
the South," replied the man. "What doctrine do the masters of the
South teach?" asked Hwui Chung again. "They teach, sir, that body is
mortal, but mind is immortal," was the answer. "That," said the
master, "is the heterodox doctrine of the Atman!" "How do you, sir,"
questioned the monk, "teach about that?" "I teach that the body and
mind are one," was the reply.

For further explanation, see Sho-bo-gen-zo and

Fiske, in his argument against materialism, blames the
denial of immortality, saying: "The materialistic assumption that
there is no such state of things, and that the life of the soul ends
accordingly with the life of the body, is perhaps the most colossal
instance of baseless assumption that is known to the history of
philosophy." But we can say with equal force that the common-sense
assumption that the life of soul continues beyond the grave is,
perhaps, the most colossal instance of baseless assumption that is
known to the history of thought, because, there being no scientific
evidences that give countenance to the assumption, even the
spiritualists themselves hesitate to assert the existence of a ghost
or soul. Again he says: "With this illegitimate hypothesis
of annihilation the materialist transgresses the bounds of experience
quite as widely as the poet who sings of the New Jerusalem with its
river of life and its street of gold. Scientifically speaking, there
is not a particle of evidence for either view." This is as much as
to say there is not a particle of evidence, scientifically speaking,
for the common-sense view of soul, because the poet's description of
the New Jerusalem is nothing but the result of the common-sense
belief of immortality.

'The Destiny of Man,' p. 110.

'The Destiny of Man,' pp. 110, 111.

Next: The Examination Of The Notion Of Self

Previous: Enlightenment Implies An Insight Into The Nature Of Self

Add to Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to Add to Google Add to Twitter Add to Stumble Upon
Add to Informational Site Network

Viewed 1425